Right to Shelter 2023

Dear Mayor Eric Adams,


As New York City’s healthcare workers, we see that housing and health are inseparable. No medical therapy we provide can improve the health of unhoused patients without the safety and security of permanent housing. Recently, New York has become home to many new individuals and families arriving from Latin America, West Africa, and other regions around the world. Many have been uprooted by economic instability, inhospitable climate conditions, and/or political upheaval, some of which are direct products of US intervention in their native countries. The trauma experienced by these individuals, many of them children, warrants mental health treatment. Unfortunately, rather than working to provide these new arrivals with the resources and care needed to start anew, our administration has elected to propagate xenophobic rhetoric, calling the crisis one of migrants and not one of housing. In particular, we believe that the recently enacted 60-day limit on shelter for single adults—and the new even harsher 30-day limit—are cruel and counterproductive. Physical, mental, and financial health can only be effectively built on a base of secure housing, towards which shelters are an imperfect but critical first step for many. We strongly urge you to reverse this policy and instead commit resources towards expanded housing access for both new and existing shelter residents.


Although not a permanent solution, city shelters have been a critical service for our community. In FY2022, single adults required on average at least 16 months in shelters before transitioning forward, primarily due to a lack of safe, affordable housing options or a robust infrastructure to support pathways to permanent housing. The increased number of new arrivals in recent months has made starkly clear the inadequacy of our city’s current housing services. With hundreds of migrants already having been forced to sleep on the streets, the new shelter stay limits will further burden already understaffed city housing services as they struggle to process current shelter residents alongside new migrants. Additionally, we believe that this undermines New York City’s right to shelter under the 1981 Callahan consent decree, which has enabled our city to provide compassionate care for so many who have desperately needed it. Furthermore, limiting shelter access would disproportionately affect people with trauma, mental illness, and need for recovery-based solutions, thereby significantly worsening the very problems related to homelessness and mental illness that the administration has been vocal about solving. The 60-day and now 30-day limit does nothing to improve our housing crisis. It instead exposes more vulnerable community members to health hazards as they become unsheltered and furthers the notion that new arrivals are not welcome in our city.


Your administration currently has the means to enact transformative policy to address the current housing crisis, even while continuing to seek state and federal assistance. Instead of cycling unhoused New Yorkers between the streets and shelters, we can take steps to break the cycle and move more shelter residents into affordable permanent housing. We echo the recommendations of the Coalition for the Homeless and the Legal Aid Society to better address the urgent housing needs of both recently arrived neighbors and existing shelter residents.

We, New York City’s healthcare workers, cannot stand by while our patients’ health and safety are compromised by lack of access to adequate housing. We emphatically oppose the 60-day and now 30-day limits on shelter stays, which exacerbate our current crisis, and strongly urge you to instead invest in steps toward safe, affordable housing for everyone who calls New York City home.

In support of our old and new neighbors,

Your healthcare workers


CC:

New York City Council Speaker Adrienne E. Adams

New York City Council Member Shahana Hanif, Chair of the Committee on Immigration

New York City Council Member Diana Ayala, Chair of the Committee on General Welfare


Signers’ affiliations are included to show breadth and strength of support. Unless indicated, signatures reflect only the views of the individuals and do not in any way represent the views or official positions of their institutions.